A friend sharedan interesting script reviewwith me :

“ Reading this translation and compilation of a number of Prof. Louis Kervran ’s pre-1970 crop is very disturbing , producing the disorientation that accompanies a possible deep epitome shift in science . Kervran ( 1901 - 1983 ) , a medical scientist and direct with a in high spirits official status in the Gallic research and occupational health community , had a lifespan - prospicient interest in the possibility of biological transmutations . His curiosity on the face of it commence in his youth when he watched the hens pecking at specks of mica in the farmyard . His later professional observations touch on ( in one small part ) the anomalous re - coming into court of robust calcium - bearing eggshells in atomic number 20 - deprived chickens that had been administered dietetic mica ( a atomic number 19 - rich mineral ) . Over a century in the first place ( in 1799 ) , French pill pusher Louis Nicolas Vauquelin had noted this . The Kervran bio - transmutation history and its background is summarize eloquently in “ alchemist in the Garden , ” a chapter of the best - sell Word of God The Secret Life of Plants by Peter Tompkins and the belated Christopher Bird .

If Kervran ’s dissertation is true , how could mainstream investigator , through the era of advanced modern biochemistry and molecular biology , have missed the ubiquitousness of biologic nuclear transubstantiation ? The critics ’ answer is simple : biological transmutation is delusion or fabrication — just as cold fusion remains , from their linear perspective . Post-1989 moth-eaten spinal fusion critic , in fact , used the Kervran story to bemock Fleischmann and Pons by linking them with a man they articulate believed in “ atomic powered chickens . ” But for those who gravely essay the evidence for inorganic , low - energy atomic reaction and fleshy component transmutation on electrodes in cold fusion experiments , there is sufficient reason to take Kervran ’s hypothesis seriously . If non - biological blue - energy atomic reactions ( LENR ) exist in the laboratory , why not in the natural world ? ”

Article image

This is fundamental here :

“ Kervran ’s thesis is that the transmutation of factor , in special by reaction among the first few dozen of the periodic table , occurs on a regular basis in biologic organisation — both in microbes and in multicellular organisms such as human beings . Transmutation is inherent to biology . He close that H and oxygen nucleus primarily , by adding or subtracting from other nuclei , is the essence of transmutation in biology . Some examples:11Na +8O – > 19K;19 K +1H – > 20Ca;20Ca – 1H – > 19 K ; or12Mg +8O – > 20Ca . carbon paper might also enter , e.g.14Si +6C – > 20Ca . Kervran did not suggest how such exothermic and endothermal bio - nuclear reactions might be alleviate at the atomic - atomic level ( others would do that later1 ) , but he did collect and correlate many anomalous biochemical observations from 19th and twentieth one C researchers . He claimed these endorse his ending , but he also made original reflexion and conducted his own experiment . If Kervran ’s thesis is right , the natural world may teem with countless bio - alchemical manufactory , which , in turn , forge unplumbed alterations in the mineralogical opus of the planet . ”

Andfrom another website :

“ Louis Nicolas Vauquelin , a celebrated French chemist , describe that chicken could bring forth more calcium in their shell than entered their body .   Hence they had to be able-bodied to “ make ” the calcium , else their own body would have been completely deplete . One of his generation , however – Antoine Laurent Lavoisier – became the “ don of chemistry . ”   Lavoisier lay down the obiter dictum that nothing was created .   So chemistry fixed upon the notion that the combination of element could be transfer , but the element itself could not be transformed . Not until the breakthrough of radioactivity did any crack in this solid wall appear .   But still , the basic ideas of chemical science say the element could n’t be transformed chemically .   It could only be transformed if one blasted the daylights out of it with an atomic or corpuscle bullet . Today most chemist still hold that precise same ruling , unshaken . To resume : Over a one C ago , a chemist named Albrecht von Herzeele essay that germinating seeds somehow transmuted elements in the unconscious process .   In 1873 von Herzeele published a Holy Scripture , The Origin of Inorganic Substances , where he present enquiry shew that flora unendingly create material elements . Even in the first place , in 1822 an Englishman call William Prout had analyze chicken eggs in brooding .   He set up that hatched chicks had more lime tree ( calcium ) in their body than was to begin with present in the egg!Another French scientist named Henri Spindler discovered that a form of algae foretell Laminaria could make iodine . A German investigator named Vogel had establish cress plant seed in a gong jar .   They were fed nothing but distilled water ; still , when acquire they hold back more sulfur than had been in the seeds originally . Lawes and Gilbert , two British researchers , also ascertain that plant could “ elicit ” more element from the soil than the soil actually contained in the first place . Baranger perform G of meticulous experiments in plant transubstantiation of elements .   He proved that the transmutations do go on .   He also detect that many things affected the germinating source transmutation process : the time the seed germinate , the eccentric of igniter they are exposed to , the form of the moon , etc . None of these experimenter understood the transmutation process used by the living being .   But they proved beyond interrogative that the unconscious process existed , and universally hap . ”

What a lapin hole . If lawful , this would vindicate some of the more mystical nurseryman who believe that with enough biological activity even alimentary - short soils can have all they require to support healthy plants . If bacteria and fungi and plant life can take an abundant element and transform it into one that is missing , they could change the soil in an field and thrive without a staring balance of mineral being added by a Fannie Merritt Farmer .

This is , of course , not at all possible accord to current scientific consensus . The experiments are fascinating , however . Where are those factor number from ?

Periodic Table range copyrightTodd Helmenstine @ Sciencenotes.org

Does Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer Destroy Soil Carbon?

How to Make Homemade Potting Soil With Three…

Soil Creation and Thoughts On Complexity

The Five Keys to Building Healthy Soil

Making Homemade Seed Starting Mix

Improving Soil Fertility via Burning

Gardening in the Florida Panhandle – Why is…

The Quest for Terra Preta

What do we do with sand?

Short on Soil? Naw, You Got This!